Today's Top Stories Also Noted: Kaseya News From the Fierce Network:
Today's Top News1. Wells Fargo suffers from drought
The bloom has long been off the banking-insurance synergy rose, but some banks retain some insurance operations. For example, Wells Fargo's Rural Community Insurance stands as the largest approved provider of crop insurance. In 2011, it racked up $1.8 billion in sales, notes Bloomberg. American Financial Group is also active, as it sells crop insurance along with other forms of insurance. Unfortunately, the drought in the mid-west may raise the likelihood that these insurance units will have to pay out massively. Standard & Poor's says that crop insurers, by Wells Fargo, "may face losses that exceed $5 billion if this year's U.S. drought is worse than one in 1988. Underwriting losses will be a drag on earnings, but by themselves, will not affect the capital of most insurers that we rate," S&P said, adding that "We do not expect to take any rating actions solely because of crop insurance losses." Wells Fargo has reinsurance, but it may be that the accounting will require some paper losses. All in all, the drought would not appear to be hugely consequential to bank earnings. In fact, it presents some opportunities. At least one bank is sensing an opportunity to do right by local customers who have been hard hit, a good PR move to be sure. Credit unions are also sensing opportunities to extend more loans, the chagrin of banks. For more:
Read more about: Wells Fargo, Insurance
2. Bank of America changes policy on old accounts
In part to head off mounting criticism, Bank of America has decided to change its policy on old, closed bank accounts, which the bank routinely revived if the account was targeted for some sort of automatic transaction, reports the Huffingtong Post. The policy was understandable on several levels. The bank pitched it as a service of course, but it also helped with customer retention and made the bank's overall account totals look good. Such practices, to be fair, would appear to be more rife at online brokerages, where it can be very difficult to actually close an account. They seem to exist forever with a penny in it. In any case, Bank of America's policy was heavily criticized by Consumers Union, which said the practice opened consumers up to hidden fees, and the bank has bowed to the inevitable. Rather than risk another public debacle, like the one that broke out over its proposed debit card fee, it has decided to change its policy. So no longer will electronic debits or credits automatically re-open a previously closed account. Consumers Union has hailed this as a major victory. It also took the opportunity to press for changes that would make it easier for people to switch banks. Banks would be wise to look into this now, as it is the sort of issue that will have the CFPB salivating before too long. For more:
Read more about: Bank of America, Closed Accounts 3. Citigroup continues stealth break up
Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit has been on something of a communications tour as late, talking up the bank's prospects and commenting on the idea that banks ought to be broken up. There's no doubt he'd rather talk about other things, but since a former Citigroup CEO put the break-up issue on the table, he really has no choice but to talk about it. He has walked an interesting tight rope on the issue and hasn't exactly broken ranks with the industry and come out in even mild favor of Weill's views. But he also notes that at his bank anyway, a kind of stealth break up has been underway via asset sales. Since coming aboard as CEO, he has sold off private-equity stakes, auto credits, retail mortgage portfolios, the Student Loan Corp., and insurer Primerica. As reported by Bloomberg, Pandit no longer views the bank as a traditional conglomerate selling a wide array of financial services via some sort of supermarket approach. "The 1998 merger of Citicorp with insurer Travelers Group Inc. didn't turn out to be everything people thought it was going to be," Pandit was quoted. "The focus of that merger, which was supermarket banking or financial supermarket, is a strategy that I don't believe is right for the times. Not only that, I don't believe it's right for our bank….Getting out of that strategy is what we've done. And now we focus on what is really the core banking business of this institution." This is an interesting approach to the issue. Other banks may follow suit as they address the break up issue. But the big issue in the debate is separating the investment banking from the commercial banking and perhaps even wealth management. As long as all that remains melded, albeit without any real synergies, the break up issue will be in the air. For more: Related articles:
Read more about: Citigroup 4. Spitzer defends global settlement
The news that Goldman Sachs was shuttering its Hudson Street independent research initiative has led to a new round of hand-wringing about the state of independent research. The conventional wisdom seems to be that once the vaunted "global settlement" of charges of tainted research against 10 big banks expired, which it did in 2008, the once strong wind powering the industry has died down. Eliot Spitzer, whose office negotiated the deal when he was state AG, defended the deal to the Financial Times. "I think we accomplished something. There are a lot of independent research firms out there, some doing well and others not. Goldman has other business models and other priorities." He also noted that "We accomplished what we wanted, the public is much more aware of these conflicts…At the time, it was the most fundamental restructuring of Wall Street that had taken place in decades. The problem was that the research that was proffered to the public as independent and unbiased was in fact biased." The real issue in my mind was the business model. The soft-dollar approach seemed to predominate in the end, but there are fewer soft dollars to go around right now, and sell-side research, for better or worse, is still seen as must-have. In the end, the independent research industry never found a business model with real staying power, hence the Hudson Street news. There are plenty of independents with innovative products, often linked to specific industries, that are finding many willing buyers. For more:
Read more about: analysts, Global Settlement 5. Citigroup's withering Nasdaq criticism
For Nasdaq OMX, the Facebook fiasco is not going away. In fact, the woes are multiplying, and so perhaps are the ultimate costs. There could be some significant changes in store for the exchange company if Citigroup succeeds in its efforts at persuading the SEC that Nasdaq's handling of the situation and the proposed restitution were both terribly inadequate. Citigroup has released a blistering letter to the SEC that criticizes Nasdaq at every turn, painting a damning portrait of an exchange company that rushed to win the IPO mandate, relied on flawed, untested processes, blamed technical glitches not human error, and offered a pittance in relief. "Nasdaq's only interest in accommodation was to satisfy the public perception that it failures will not result in investor losses. While the $62 million pool in this SEC Submission is a larger cash contribution, that is perhaps sufficient to mislead the investing public to believe that Nasdaq is standing up for its obligations; however, compensation paid by market maker and broker participants to their customers far exceeds the sum Nasdaq has proffered by a multiple of roughly seven. Nasdaq's proposal simply fails to take into account the confusion its known design flaw, insufficient failover procedures and reckless business judgment had on the market participants that trade there." The letter reflects a great deal of anger at the way the post-fiasco negotiations went down, as the vitriol was somewhat surprising, accusing management of negligent behavior, blaming the disaster not on technology glitches . But on risky, misguided, self-interested human decisions it really is quite a read. The top market makers disagree on the Nasdaq proposal, as Knight ultimately supported the final offer while Citigroup and possibly others are not having it. For more: Related articles: Read more about: Citigroup, Nasdaq Also Noted
SPOTLIGHT ON... Jamie Dimon's language at issue The CEO of JPMorgan Chase is famously combative, so when he used the f-word recently in an interview with New York magazine, I took it as a sign that Jamie Dimon hasn't really changed much since the catastrophic Whale Trades. His PR people should probably talk to him though, as they certainly don't want his foul language to take on a life of its own. Reporters likely go into interviews with him hoping he will use such language, as it makes for good copy. Article Company News:
©2012 FierceMarkets This email was sent to kumaresan.selva.blogger@gmail.com as part of the FierceFinance email list which is administered by FierceMarkets, 1900 L Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 628-8778. Contact Us Editor: Jim Kim Advertise Advertising: Jack Fordi or call 202.824.5040 Email Management Unsubscribe from FierceFinance Explore our network of publications: |
Live News, Copper,Zinc, Silver,Gold ,Crude Oil,Natural Gas finance-world-breaking-news.blogspot.com
Friday, August 24, 2012
| 08.24.12 | Citigroup continues stealth break up
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment