Also Noted: Spotlight On... The future of Gleacher News From the Fierce Network:
Today's Top News1. New standard for loan loss reserves triggers controversy
Reserves against loan losses were a large drain on bank earnings in the aftermath of the financial crisis. But then the economic and operating environment improved, and releases of reserves ended up being a powerful source of much-needed earnings. So the sword cuts both ways. The issue is topical in light of a recent proposal by the FASB that would change the way banks approach the decision to reserve against loan losses. Under current rules, the "incurred-loss" approach, banks set aside reserves when there are already signs of a loss. Under the proposed "expected-loss" standard, however, banks would be able to look ahead, using their own forecasts of loan losses, in order to reserve against expected losses. The big controversy in all this involves the likelihood that banks will be able to use the new expected-loss standard to smooth earnings to an unseemly extreme. Reuters quotes one expert who said that, "If I had to dream up a way to manage earnings, I think this is probably as good as it gets." Another sounds a more ominous note noting that, "The question isn't so much will somebody do bad accounting with this; somebody will…The question is, will it become widespread, accepted practice to do the accounting badly?" Some have called for an approach that would rely more on mark-to-market valuations. We'll likely hear more possible alternatives as more public comments hit the FASB. Comments are due May 31. For more: Read more about: Fasb, Loan Loss Reserves
Is the gold market a sucker's bet, or an amazing buying opportunity? It's hard to sit on the fence when it comes to the gold market. Lots of people have jumped off the bandwagon this year. Since 2011, when gold traded at $250 an ounce, it has been on a massive run fueled by lots of scary economic news and plenty of raw speculation. The price peaked at $1,880 in August of 2011 and now trades at about $1,350. Last week, the market suffered its biggest one-day decline in 30 years before staging a strong comeback. Lots of analysts, including the team at Goldman Sachs, have recommended exiting the commodity, but hedge funds are more than willing to buck that advice. Led by John Paulson, who has benefitted massively from the long-term gold run-up, hedge funds are now boosting their positions. In Paulson's view, as noted by Bloomberg, central-bank stimulus will "eventually lead to inflation." The hedge fund is the biggest shareholder in the SPDR Gold Trust, the largest exchange-traded fund backed by the metal. The articles also notes CFTC data showing that fund managers and other speculators boosted net-long positions in gold almost 10 percent. For the moment, short covering may be behind the short-term recovery. A larger battle will rage for years. In seems like a classic hedge funds vs. central banks war is brewing. For more: Related Articles:
Read more about: Hedge Funds, John Paulson 3. Morgan Stanley wins with wealth management
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) would like wealth management to emerge as a larger contributor to earnings. That concept has been in vogue for the past few years, as lots of banks, especially in Europe, have cratered in investment banking and sales and trading. It would be hard to claim that Morgan Stanley has cratered to the extent that UBS, has. Still, it seems wise to want to build up in wealth management. Its purchase of Smith Barney from Citigroup as of now looks like a winning move, after few years during which the technical integration was a big question mark. In the first quarter, wealth management pre-tax income soared nearly 50 percent to almost $600 million. While the unit accounted for 42 percent of net revenue, it contributed about half of the entire bank's pre-tax net income. LEX makes the following point: "If the rally has legs, and wealth management is officially past its post-crisis gloom, buying Smith Barney looks, in retrospect, like a wise move." Indeed, as more people count on a rotation into equities, wealth management looms as strategically more important these days, especially as Morgan Stanley's investment banking and capital markets business stumble. Net revenues from FICC at the bank stands as a great example; it fell 42 per cent. "Morgan Stanley is reducing risk-weighted assets and pruning its business, but not withdrawing outright from any areas," LEX notes. This makes built-in offsets, as represented by wealth management, more important. That said, the competition will be fierce as some think that brokerage units owned by commercial banks have a big advantage, as they can integrate credit into their offerings. For more: Read more about: Morgan Stanley 4. Silver Lake likely to proceed with Dell deal
What a difference one personal computer sales report can make. Since research firms IDC and Gartner issued reports this month documenting double-digit drops in the global market for personal computers, the ground has shifted beneath Dell's feet. The reports quickly led to Blackstone's decision to stop pursuing a deal to buy the computer marker, all but scuttling hopes that a bidding battle between at least two would-be buyers would break out. Now the focus shifts back to Silver Lake, which put forward a proposal with the backing of Michael Dell and Microsoft in February to buy the company for $13.65 a share. One could argue now that the offer appears to be too high, given the new data. But Bloomberg notes that it will be hard for Silver Lake to back out of the deal because of some contractual restrictions and a break-fee agreement that could cost the private equity company $750 million if it wanted out. If Silver Lake really wanted out of the deal, it would have to come up with a MAC. It possibly could argue that it relied on overly rosy sales projections. But at this point, there has been no indication that the firm wants to back out. But you never know what sort of discussions are underway behind closed doors. For more: Related Articles: Read more about: Leveraged Buyout, Dell 5. S&P claims it is innocent of fraud
The main credit rating companies were stained by what in hindsight were shocking ratings of CDOs and other mortgage-related securities. It seems to many that these companies were handing out AAA ratings for fat fees, with little regard for actual creditworthiness. Of course, we're talking about tail risk. And it's fair to say the entire industry was rushing like lemmings driven by a belief that credit events were all but impossible. Very few bucked that belief, and the ones that did ended up making millions. Standard & Poor's ratings may have reflected some very shoddy work, but was it actually fraud? The Justice Department says yes, as it charged the debt rating company with defrauding investors and others by selling their services as "objective, independent, uninfluenced by any conflicts of interest that might compromise S&P's analytic judgment." The company has now responded, not Reuters, saying that while its work may amount to "puffery," it doesn't constitute fraud. In short, it argues that extreme incompetence isn't against any laws. In a previous era, this case had settlement written all over it. But the very idea that prosecutors will allow companies to pay for settlements that allow them to avoid admitting guilt has become controversial. If it does move to trial, it will be interesting to see what kind of evidence is produced beyond the emails. Recent history suggests that emails alone may not be enough. An insider who has turned on the company would be a much more powerful witness. For more: Related Articles: Read more about: S&P, Enforcement Action Also NotedSPOTLIGHT ON... The future of Gleacher Lots of big banks have decided to rebalance their revenue contributors for the future, eschewing capital markets activity to a degree, while building up in wealth management and asset management. UBS stands as a great example of this. The same strategy just might be appropriate for smaller banks. In the wake of the boutiques decision to exit fixed income, one shareholder of Gleacher has put forward its own slate of director candidates as part of an effort to force Gleacher to build up in money-management business. Others would like to liquidate the company. Article Company news:
©2013 FierceMarkets This email was sent to kumaresan.selva.blogger@gmail.com as part of the FierceFinance email list which is administered by FierceMarkets, 1900 L Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 628-8778. Contact Us Editor: Jim Kim Advertise Advertising: Jack Fordi or call 202.824.5040 Email Management Unsubscribe from FierceFinance Explore our network of publications: |
Live News, Copper,Zinc, Silver,Gold ,Crude Oil,Natural Gas finance-world-breaking-news.blogspot.com
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
| 04.23.13 | Proposed standard for loan loss reserves triggers controversy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment