Also Noted: Spotlight On... Theory: why banks dumped Treasuries News From the Fierce Network:
Today's Top News1. Would-be insider traders reduce activity
The stunning success of the insider trading investigations has led to a chill in the once-rampant practice, scaring off would-be practitioners. A recent study by professors at Florida Atlantic University has quantified the extent of the big chill in at least one area: trading ahead of announcements of mergers, a classic insider trading strategy. As noted by AllAboutAlpha, the scholars looked at pre-deal activity concluded that the chill pre-deal activity before the Raj Rajaratnam insider trading scandal blew open and compared that with pre-deal activity after the scandal. Recall that Rajaratnam was entened to 11 years in prison for his illegal trading. The study shows that "the market-adjusted abnormal stock price run-up of the target" in the days before an announcement was 5.1 percent before the Rajaratnam scandal and just 2.8 percent after the scandal. "Put otherwise, pre-Galleon runups amounted to 14.8% of the takeover premium. The more modest post-Galleon run-ups amount to just 7.9% of that premium." So it seems that would-be inside traders have been spooked and significantly reduced their activity, though such activity still appears to be going on. Equity hedge funds would have to be crazy to play it loose at a time like this, though it will likely not be long before some might find it safe to play the game again. At some point, the prosecutors will move on. For more: Read more about: insider trading, Enforcement Action 2. Pimco faces an uncertain future
For as long as younger Wall Street employees can remember, Pimco has been synonymous with bond market bullishness. The company was essentially built on ever-falling interest rates, which pushed Pimco to new heights, cresting as the fifth largest asset manager in the world. But how the world has changed. "Now, as interest rates have surged in the last two months, the company is showing several signs of stress," DealBook notes. "Three-quarters of the company's popular exchange-traded funds have experienced outflows in June, with two of them losing nearly 40 percent of their holdings, according to data from Lipper. Meanwhile, nearly 70 percent of Pimco's mutual funds and E.T.F.'s have been underperforming their benchmarks, data from Morningstar shows." In a not necessarily encouraging marketing move, two top executives have written articles "comparing their customers to passengers afloat in treacherous waters, with reassurances as to why they will survive." The PR and marketing folks really ought to rethink the Titanic imagery. It will be tough for a firm with 90 percent of its assets in fixed-income products to sail through the current environment without some dings. At this point, it's understandable why some would think that the storied firm is due to take a back seat. This points to the dynamism that capital markets inflection points represent. There's a sea change afoot, and it holds the power to reorder the industry, creating new stars. So who's next? For more:
Read more about: PIMCO, bonds 3. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley embrace private banking
If there's one thing that all can agree on it's that top investment banks would be wise to expand their wealth management and private banking operations. The reality is that the shareholders appreciate efforts to develop reliable revenue streams that can smooth the volatility that comes with sales and trading activity and core investment banking activity. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are unsurprisingly expanding their wealth management and private banking businesses, notes the Financial Times. Goldman Sachs' private bank maintains $46 billion in assets, while Morgan Stanley maintains $131 billion. Both would like to grow. The two banks for now are targeting different markets. Goldman focuses on the extremely wealthy, "unofficially those with a minimum of $10m in investible assets," while Morgan Stanley targets the merely very rich. Goldman Sachs employs 600 wealth advisors, while Morgan Stanley employs 16,000. The need for a bank as well as a wealth management unit has become increasingly clear to both. Wealth management units owned by commercial banks have tried to use their ability to offer credit as a strategic differentiator. It's unclear how decisive that is in the minds of would-be clients, but if you can't offer loans, it's hard to call yourself a full-service wealth management operation. Here's an intriguing thought: At some point, would it make sense for Goldman Sachs to go downstream and capture revenue from an enlarged market? Would an acquisition be out of the question? For more: Read more about: private banking 4. Mass. looks into sales practices targeting seniors
The investing landscape ismore complex these days, as brokers tend to push a lot more than stock and mutual funds. The really high-margin products for brokers tend to be structured products, complex partnerships, private trusts, hedge fund-lite products and so forth. The sales folks can really spin a good tale---that's their job after all---that can make the prospects for strong returns perhaps a bit overly rosy, if you know what I mean. There's a fine line between good salesmanship and deception. William Galvin, the Massachusetts Secretary of State, who has long had an interest in financial services, is exploring the issue. He has sent subpoenas to 15 banks and investment brokerage firms to investigate business practices related to sales of higher-risk alternative investments to older customers. The list of subpoena recipients include: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Fidelity Brokerage Services, Charles Schwab & Co., Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo Advisors, UBS Securities, TD Ameritrade, and LPL Financial. This latest round of subpoenas stems from a previous investigation into the sale of REITs to seniors. Five independent broker dealers paid $11 million in fines in that case, as noted by the Boston Globe. Galvin apparently is seeking information about the volume of sales to seniors, the marketing programs involved and the volume of complaints the programs have generated. To be sure, scams against seniors involving financial products have been a big issue as of late. We may see attorneys general in other states piggy back on this. For more: Read more about: William Galvin, Enforcement Action 5. Long prison terms for insider traders upheld
In the pantheon of convicted insider traders, who was dealt the harshest prison term? The knee-jerk answer would be Raj Rajaratnam, the Galleon founder, who was slapped with an 11-year prison sentence. Wrong! The distinction of receiving the longest sentence went to Mathew Kluger, the attorney who provided inside tips on various mergers to a middle man, who passed the tips on to a brokerage guy, who made trades. All three were eventually arrested. Kluger was eventually hit with a 12-year prison term. Like Rajaratnam, Kluger has not been successful on appeal. An appellate court in Philadelphia this week upheld Kluger's sentence. "Kluger was an attorney who took an oath to uphold the law," the appeals court said in a 48-page ruling, as noted by Bloomberg. "It is really quite remarkable that Kluger could not even wait to graduate from law school before using his employment at a law firm to initiate his illegal activities." There's a lesson here for lawyers: If you turn to crime and are caught, you will be dealt with harshly, you will be made an example. At this point, prison sentences for just about all those who have been sent to prison have stood up on appeal. Last week, an appeals court in New York upheld the 10-year prison sentence that was given ex-Galleon Group LLC trader Zvi Goffer. Rajaratnam continues to serve his sentence in Massachusetts. Kluger is incarcerated in North Carolina. For more: Read more about: insider trading Also NotedSPOTLIGHT ON... Theory: why banks dumped Treasuries The trigger for the recent bond sell off might have been news about QE3. But was there another reason that banks decided to bail out of bonds? One commentator has a theory. He thinks that once the selling started banks got "an idea of how to get out from under the Fed's box and the public's blame by taking a short-term balance sheet hit by dumping their Treasury holdings and thereby forcing up long rates that are key to their loan profits. Most of them (witness JPMorgan and its London Whale trader) have more capital than they know what to do with anyway." Article Company News:
©2013 FierceMarkets This email was sent to kumaresan.selva.blogger@gmail.com as part of the FierceFinance email list which is administered by FierceMarkets, 1900 L Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 628-8778. Contact Us Editor: Jim Kim Advertise Advertising: Jack Fordi or call 202.824.5040 Email Management Unsubscribe from FierceFinance Explore our network of publications: |
Live News, Copper,Zinc, Silver,Gold ,Crude Oil,Natural Gas finance-world-breaking-news.blogspot.com
Friday, July 12, 2013
| 07.12.13 | Pimco faces uncertain future
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment